Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


@Tom D., Sophi, Charles H., Cor, *,

Please stop!  

Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) has agreed to check out the function on master to
see if it has addressed the UX regression introduced with the new inline
field editing introduced at 4.2--when we have feed back we will revisit
fdo#76565 and requesting backport of the patch.

That was all that Werner and I had asked, and in my opinion the response we
were seeking.

The rest is just noise.

Stuart







--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-handle-regressions-tp4124391p4124658.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.